Internal Law 2 Private law - Administration of civil justice - Enforcement 27 Civil procedure
Dretg naziunal 2 Dretg privat - Giurisdicziun civila - Execuziun 27 Giurisdicziun civila

272 Swiss Civil Procedure Code of 19 December 2008 (Civil Procedure Code, CPC)

272 Cudesch da procedura civila svizzer dals 19 da december 2008 (Cudesch da procedura civila, CPC)

Index Inverser les langues Précédent Suivant
Index Inverser les langues

Art. 396 Grounds for review

1 A party may request the ordinary court that has jurisdiction under Article 356 paragraph 1 to review an arbitral award if:

a.
the party subsequently discovers significant facts or decisive evidence that could not have been submitted in the earlier proceedings, excluding facts and evidence that arose after the arbitral award was made;
b.
criminal proceedings have established that the arbitral award was influenced to the detriment of the party concerned by a felony or misdemeanour, even if no one is convicted by a criminal court; if criminal proceedings are not possible, proof may be provided in some other manner;
c.
it is claimed that the acceptance, withdrawal or settlement of the claim is invalid;
d.186
a ground for challenge under Article 367 paragraph 1 letter c only came to light after conclusion of the arbitration proceedings despite exercising due diligence and no other legal remedy is available.

2 The review on the grounds of a violation of the ECHR187 may be requested if:

a.188
the European Court of Human Rights has determined in a final judgment (Art. 44 ECHR) that the ECHR or its protocols have been violated, or the case has been concluded by means of a friendly settlement (Art. 39 ECHR);
b.
compensation is not an appropriate remedy for the effects of the violation; and
c.
the review is necessary to remedy the violation.

186 Inserted by Annex No 2 of the FA of 19 June 2020, in force since 1 Jan. 2021 (AS 2020 4179; BBl 2018 7163).

187 SR 0.101

188 Amended by Annex No 2 of the FA of 1 Oct. 2021, in force since 1 July 2022 (AS 2022 289; BBl 2021 300, 889).

Art. 395 Decisiun

1 Sch’ina sentenzia da cumpromiss na vegn betg refusada a la dretgira da cumpromiss u na vegn betg rectifitgada u cumplettada da tala a temp, decida l’instanza da recurs davart il recurs ed abolescha la sentenzia da cumpromiss, il mument ch’ella approvescha il recurs.

2 Sche la sentenzia da cumpromiss vegn abolida, decida la dretgira da cumpromiss da nov a norma da las consideraziuns en la decisiun da refusaziun. Sch’ella n’è betg pli cumpletta, vegn applitgà l’artitgel 371.184

3 L’aboliziun po vegnir restrenschida a singulas parts da la sentenzia da cumpromiss, sche las autras parts na dependan betg da quellas.

4 Sche la sentenzia da cumpromiss vegn contestada, perquai che las indemnisaziuns e las expensas dals derschaders da cumpromiss èn evidentamain excessivas, po l’instanza recurs decider sezza davart questas summas.

184 Integrà la segunda frasa tras la cifra 2 da l’agiunta da la LF dals 19 da zer. 2020, en vigur dapi il 1. da schan. 2021 (AS 2020 4179; BBl 2018 7163).

 

This document is not an official publication. Only the publication of the Federal Chancellery is legally binding.
Il presente documento non è una pubblicazione ufficiale. Fa unicamente fede la pubblicazione della Cancelleria federale. Ordinanza sulle pubblicazioni ufficiali, OPubl.